On the illusion of equality

On the 27th of February, I attended a lecture at LSE on “The Ideas of Equality: Feminisms of the 21st Century”. I was privileged to hear a panel of four different speakers: two of whom left a big impression on me. Many of the subjects that were touched upon resonated deeply with me. I hope to write on some of those themes later on but primarily, I want to discuss a topic that was brought up: the illusion of equality.

Dr Heide Mirza, one of the speakers, said that we live in a dangerous era where there is a perception that we live in times of “post-race” and “post-feminism” with the civil rights movement and the suffragette movement far behind us, as if we’ve reached a nirvana where we have it all. Now, we have reduced the “hurt parties” to white men. Oh how the tables have turned.

Professor Sophie-Grace Chappell later spoke about how our liberal freedoms and rights are at risk. We are in a time where there is a big and accepted platform for white, rich politicians to preach anti-women, anti-gay, anti-trans, anti-race speech.

What I see is that we currently live in an era where the word “equality” is a magic buzzword that, quite frankly, achieves very little. There is an attitude that has been well incorporated into the developed world that racist and sexist days are over because the movements have come and gone. This actually further marginalises women and people of colour. Guess who gets hit with the double whammy? Women of colour. Time and time again, we are excluded from public discourse pushed through by white feminism. The idea of intersectionality is now also a buzzword that is politicised and abused to pretend that women of colour are no longer marginalised exceptionally because mainstream feminism is now “inclusive” irrespective of race and sexuality.

We have over-used the word “equality” to the point where it no longer has the weight it did. Whether this is because our perception of being in a “post race” and “post feminism” state (and thereby marginilise the still existing social issues and, dare I say, oppression) or not, that’s up to you to decide. I also see that the “equality” many people fight for is a blanket term that doesn’t seem to achieve anything. I see that this is because of ‘speech act’ of our inclusivity of intersectionality, as stated above, where it claims to aid other minorities without actually actively doing anything to achieve the claim.

So how do we change this? This brings me back to a lecture I went to (and wrote about) earlier on “Muslim Feminist” where the speakers spoke about the idea of equality and justice. There is a rather famous cartoon where there are three men of different heights trying to see over a wall. Equality is giving them all the same size blocks but this means only the tallest can see over the wall. Justice is giving them different size blocks so they can all see over the wall. Is this not what we aim to achieve when we speak about equality? How then, can we ask everyone to be treated the same when we are innately different, whether it is race, gender, sexuality, or background? We ask for fairness in a fundamentally unfair world – the kind of unfair that is both changeable and unchangeable. By changeable I mean the social issues and structures that we are fighting against and by the unchangeable I mean we are all born different, talented in different ways, weak in different ways to one another. We are in an inherently unfair world, so to ask for equality is unreasonable, but rather ask for justice – for an opportunity to level the playing field so we can all see over the wall.


6 Replies to “On the illusion of equality”

  1. Hi Mint, My name is Cynthia Hornig and I am the co-founder of womenyoushouldknow.net, a digital brand dedicated to women’s and girls’ empowerment. I would love to connect with you regarding republishing. Look forward to connecting with you.


    1. Thank you for this! I agree with you entirely but I also think that sometimes people say they want equal opportunity for all without really realising that it doesn’t always help. For a person who’s working 2 jobs over-time and is a single parent to be given the same opportunities as a middle classed single parent doesn’t help the former person because they aren’t supported with the means to pursue the opportunities available. Does that make sense?
      Thank you for the thought!


  2. Hello. I wonder if it is possible to have Justice & Equality in this world. Justice without some form of Equality seems, to me, off kilter. Otherwise we might as well discard the word ‘equality’ from the English language.

    Thanks for the moderation.


    1. Hello – I see your point and I do agree with you on that front. I was just trying to make the point that the word “equality” has almost become redundant and the meaning of it isn’t necessarily what we hope to achieve. I agree with you that Justice and Equality should go hand in hand but what’s happening right now isn’t effective.
      Thanks for reading and commenting!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s